Ahmed Zamen, 43, is accused of a total of five counts such as rape. A jury heard exactly how his alleged sufferer gave up trying to react because she ‘couldn’t throw your down’
A man lured a Tinder day to their residence and raped the girl despite her claiming no “at the very least 20 times”, a judge has read
Ahmed Zamen, 43, declines raping the girl at their dull in Cardiff this past year, claiming the alleged victim found their residential property and engaged in sex willingly.
The offence is alleged to have chosen to take spot from the defendant’s house in Cathays the spot where the pair fulfilled for the first time. The complainant cannot deny that she knowingly visited Zamen’s residence but mentioned that she failed to consent to their sexual advances.
Starting the outcome towards the jury on Tuesday prosecutor Roger Griffiths informed Cardiff top judge that Zamen, which denies all allegations against him, guided the victim to his house rather than the club where these were because of fulfill. It is alleged that here he presumably sexually assaulted the lady.
Zamen are accused of two counts of intimate assault, one of tried rape, certainly one of assault by penetration, and something of rape. The guy declines all matters.
The courtroom heard that after leaving his land the complainant – that automatic lifelong anonymity – contacted law enforcement and Zamen is arrested here morning.
Mr Griffiths stated the alleged incident happened after defendant came across the complainant in person for the first time once they got paired on matchmaking app Tinder. The program was indeed to choose a glass or two at Gassy Jacks club in Cathays in January a year ago.
Mr Griffiths explained your alleged prey did not can get to the pub therefore requested its postcode to which Zamen answered together with very own postcode.
Following alleged victim pointed out this noticeable mistake Zamen re-sent the same postcode and suggested she park at their belongings, in Cogan rooftop, as well as could stroll towards the club.
She arranged and after arriving ended up being asked to the residential property.
The pair spoke plus the alleged victim said she had one glass of liquids while the defendant consumed orange liquid.
In videos interview played with the judge the complainant mentioned although she considered unpleasant during the house she consented to the activities.
Mr Griffiths alleged that the defendant subsequently attempted to think under the woman’s leading to which she said: “No”. It really is subsequently alleged that he began experiencing the top the lady feet through the lady pants and lifted her leading to kiss their boobs.
Also, it is alleged that while on the settee the defendant located the complainant’s hand inside their undies to touch their genitals.
Explaining the alleged experience inside her movie meeting, the complainant stated she “sunk into the lounge and tried to move out” to make it clear she was uneasy during the experience.
The judge heard the defendant then removed her into a standing place and transferred to the sack in which the guy undressed right down to their lingerie.
When questioned exactly why she didn’t attempt to create the house or property at this stage she mentioned she https://datingmentor.org/mydirtyhobby-review/ “didn’t know”. She said she was unwilling to go into the rooms and had been “wary of in which he wanted to take it” but mentioned she was not used indeed there by energy. The defendant subsequently undressed right down to his lingerie while the complainant stayed totally clothed.
When into the rooms its alleged your defendant intimately attacked the complainant in addition to raped this lady.
In a video clip interview starred towards the court the complainant mentioned she have stated “no at the least 20 circumstances” and gave up trying to react because she “couldn’t throw your off” and wasn’t “strong enough”.
She mentioned once Zamen begun to rape the girl she “didn’t start to see the aim of stating no anymore” which the guy “was probably would exactly what he desired to create anyway”.
The alleged target after that said for the meeting the defendant telephoned a buddy to set up fulfilling up for items. Soon after both alleged sufferer and Zamen kept the level and parted means.
She telephoned a buddy discussing what got occurred and went to two pharmacies searching for the day after tablet. After that nights she reported the incident to authorities.
In cross-examination protection barrister Nick Gedge interrogate the alleged target on the report on “looking for an easy method out” whilst alleged attack occurred in the bed room.
Mr Gedge mentioned: “Had you perhaps not looked for a way out before this?” and labeled the journey associated with flat the complainant have got on introduction.
She explained that she decided not to mean an actual physical “way out” but rather designed to remove herself psychologically through the circumstances.
The defence additionally asked precisely why the alleged prey had not tried to leave the specific situation following experience regarding the sofa. Mr Gedge mentioned: “precisely why performedn’t visit the bathroom? This could be a regular thing for a lady to do currently. Did you continue steadily to the bed room as you felt safe to this point?”